Estimates

Source: S&P Capital IQ consensus via Xpressfeed · Generated 2026-07-27.

The consensus tape is being marked down on earnings, not revenue: FY2027 normalized EPS has been cut roughly 12% over the past 90 days while the FY2027 revenue line held flat-to-higher. That out-year markdown coexists with a string of near-term beats — normalized EPS has topped consensus in seven of the last eight quarters. The Street stays buy-skewed with no sell ratings, but coverage thins quickly past FY2027 and the FY2027 EPS range is unusually wide.

FY2027 normalized EPS cut ~12% in 90 days while the revenue line held

The markdown sits in earnings, not revenue: FY2027 EPS is down across 30/90/180 days while FY2027 revenue is flat-to-higher. FY2028 shows a milder version of the same split.

Currency: USD · Scale: money in millions, absolute · Point-in-time consensus; Δ90d is Now versus 90d.

Metric FY 180d 90d 30d Now Δ90d
EPS (normalized) FY2027 $10.07 $9.45 $9.50 $8.36 -11.6%
EPS (normalized) FY2028 $10.06 $9.08 $10.13 $9.44 +4.0%
Revenue FY2027 $10.05bn $10.15bn $10.33bn $10.35bn +2.0%
Revenue FY2028 $10.00bn $10.49bn $11.37bn $10.81bn +3.1%

EPS beat in seven of the last eight quarters; revenue swung from misses to beats

The lone EPS miss was -4% in Q2 2025; the three most recent quarters all beat. Read against the out-year EPS cuts, the company is beating near-term while analysts trim later years.

Current sequences by metric: Revenue: 2 consecutive beats; EPS (normalized): 3 consecutive beats.

Currency: USD · Scale: money in millions, absolute · Consensus is captured before each actual first became effective.

Quarter Metric Consensus Actual Surprise Outcome
Q1 FY2026 Revenue $3.05bn $3.31bn +8.5% Beat
Q1 FY2026 EPS (normalized) $3.63 $3.83 +5.4% Beat
Q4 FY2025 Revenue $2.29bn $2.31bn +0.8% Beat
Q4 FY2025 EPS (normalized) $1.89 $2.00 +5.9% Beat
Q3 FY2025 Revenue $1.93bn $1.85bn -4.1% Miss
Q3 FY2025 EPS (normalized) $0.85 $0.97 +14.3% Beat
Q2 FY2025 Revenue $2.07bn $2.02bn -2.2% Miss
Q2 FY2025 EPS (normalized) $1.15 $1.10 -4.1% Miss
Q1 FY2025 Revenue $2.24bn $2.30bn +2.6% Beat
Q1 FY2025 EPS (normalized) $1.87 $2.02 +8.0% Beat
Q4 FY2024 Revenue $1.77bn $1.59bn -9.8% Miss
Q4 FY2024 EPS (normalized) $0.47 $0.55 +17.5% Beat
Q3 FY2024 Revenue $547.59m $407.00m -25.7% Miss
Q3 FY2024 EPS (normalized) -$0.06 $0.16 +371.4% Beat
Q2 FY2024 Revenue $603.12m $378.00m -37.3% Miss
Q2 FY2024 EPS (normalized) -$0.02 $0.01 +163.0% Beat

Forward estimates

Currency: USD · Scale: money in millions, absolute · YoY uses the prior fiscal year from the feed; analyst count and range use the first displayed period.

Metric FY2026E FY2027E FY2028E YoY Analysts Low / high
Revenue $9.94bn $10.35bn $10.81bn +17.3% 8 $9.36bn / $11.57bn
EBITDA $5.92bn $5.86bn $6.14bn +16.5% 22 $5.52bn / $7.16bn
EPS (normalized) $8.44 $8.36 $9.44 +38.3% 21 $7.50 / $9.64
Free cash flow $2.88bn $2.61bn $2.83bn +44.6%

Analysts split hard on FY2027: normalized EPS spans $4.78 to $18.37

With 22-23 analysts each, the FY2027 EPS and EBITDA ranges are too wide to be coverage noise — they reflect real disagreement on the out-year model.

Currency: USD · Scale: money in millions, absolute · Spread/mean is absolute high-low divided by absolute mean.

Metric Period Mean Low–high Spread/mean Analysts
EPS (normalized) FY2027E $8.36 $4.78–$18.37 162.5% 23
EBITDA FY2027E $5.86bn $4.70bn–$9.00bn 73.2% 22
EBITDA FY2028E $6.14bn $4.88bn–$9.10bn 68.7% 17

Street snapshot

17 buys and 3 outperforms against 6 holds and zero sells, a clearly buy-skewed book; targets range from $92 to $160.

Currency: USD · Scale: money in millions, absolute · Analyst counts shown explicitly.

Street view Reading Analysts
Recommendation mix Buy 17, Outperform 3, Hold 6, Underperform 0, Sell 0 26
Consensus score 1.58 26
Target price mean $124.1; median $124.0; high $160.0; low $92.00 25

Coverage thins fast past FY2027 and revenue is lightly modeled throughout

Revenue carries only 8 annual estimates even in current years, and outer-year coverage collapses to 5 analysts for FY2028 and 1 for FY2029 — treat those levels as indicative. EBITDA and EPS are far better covered at 20-plus.